Received: from relay2.UU.NET (relay2.UU.NET [192.48.96.7]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id LAA15070 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 11:55:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzufy11790; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 11:42:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA23851; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 11:41:59 -0500
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 11:41:59 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <9512151622.AA13302@sutm.2sprint.net>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: mward@sutm.2sprint.net (Marcus Ward)
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: Out to Video
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
>And since the PVR has a direct SCSI-2 connection to its drive, it
>outperforms ANY card that sends video over the system bus, and even the
>system buses themselves!
Actually, I seriously doubt that scsi-2 will outperform PCI. PCI 64 bit has
a maximum data transfer rate of 528 MB per second. thats megaBYTES, not bits.
Plain Jane ISA gets about 12 MB per second.
Fast Synchronous transfer mode in scsi2 and 3 at 32 bit is 40 MB per second.